Tuesday, June 17, 2008
War in Iraq
Just a little reminder of how nice it is to live in America and enjoy all of the freedoms that the country allows. As of today there are 4101 soldiers that have died for the United States of America.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
14 comments:
Yes CJG and they died for a very bad cause, in a war fomented by dual loyalists and traitors, and supported by very misguided people like yourself.
Bring our troops home now!
CHUCK BALDWIN 2008
AMERICA FIRST!
I’m not sure insulting my point of views on my blog is a polite thing to do.
You are entitled to your opinions, and I to mine.
So if you don’t agree with what I’m writing, there is no need to be insulting about it.
CJG- No one is being insulting. You are using your blog to endorse a very bad war that was essentially launched by liars, opportunists, traitors, hardline Likudnik Lobbyists, and just plain wreckers who clearly didn't have the best interest of the country at heart. You can't just invade countries preemptively because you don't like their leaders. The US behaviour in Iraq was no different from what the USSR did in Hungary in 1956 or Czechoslovakia twelve years later.
Iraq is an unmitigated disaster and most thinking Americans want this quaqmire ended. I will not support an unjust war or remain silent while American soldiers bleed for Enron and Exxon Mobil and you CJG should be ashamed of yourself for endorsing such an evil undertaking as our current military adventure in Iraq.
I am not ashamed, nor did I ever mention that I support anything to do with this war. I did however mention the casualty count on the American side. For the record I was stating how AMERICANS are NOT concerned at all with this war. I was making some of my readers aware that there IS IN FACT A WAR.
Maybe the American public has become so apathetic to this war and to the world in general because of people such as yourself wrpn. Maybe if people wouldn’t get jumped on for every comment that they made, more people would care.
Just a thought.
The American people are apathetic about Iraq because this war, and its supporters, is evil. People like myself, who had the frame of mind to oppose this insanity from its outset, will be remembered as the lights in the darkness who like Sir Thomas More, five centuries ago, stood up against a tyrant and the foul tyranny he attempted to impose on their country.
If you care about the memory of the 4000+ American lives lost in Iraq use your blog to help bring home their comrades from this mad Mesopatamian misadventure. Let us put a stop to this horrendous crime and stand up for the constitution, the Republic, and in all things America First!
WRPN- You say your not being insulting, but you just called CJG Misguided and that she should be ashamed of herself!
If you trully want to compare yourself with Sir Thomas More, then you should be less condeming of other peoples opinions reguardless of what they are, because, as you should already know, Sir Thomas More, during his time as the Speakers for the House of Commons, Championed the idea of Free Speech!
You sir, should be ashamed of yourself for attempting to silence voices of dissent by using petty insults.
Do us all a favor and please deflate that over exaggerated image of altruism and self importance that you have place upon yourself!
Sir Thomas More would have been appalled by anyone who supported something as immoral and reprehensible as the US intervention in Iraq. Misguided is too nice of a term for Iraq War supporters. Odious and treasonous are far better adjectives.
CJG never enspoused support or dissent for the war in her writing. She has only stated that we should be thinking about the troops and that we should be more concerned about the amount of soldiers dying!! It is true, Sir Thomas More would have been outraged at a War like this one. But, do you think he would have attacked someone elses opinions with petty insults and name calling??
qgActually Sir Thomas More once personally whipped a Protestant sympathiser in his own home. I for one don't believe I was insulting in anyway but even if I was we are fighting to save our country. Had the anti-war crowd been as strident as the Iraq war mongers were in '03 we wouldn't have gotten into this mess, As it stood the "Nation", Pat Buchanan's "American Conservative",West Virginia Senator Harry Byrd, Rep. Jan Schakowsky, Michael Moore, and the Dixie Chicks were the only real American heroes in the spring of 2003 in the way they vociferously denounced the US led criminal invasion of Iraq.
As I said, BRING OUR TROOPS HOME NOW, by any means possible!
Is that what you're going to do WRPN.. Personally whip people who disagree with you??? You are already comparing yourself to Sir Thomas More. After all you are saying "by any means possible".
P.S.: Your writing if filled with so much anger, I know the war is not right, but, seriously dude.. You need to chill out before you give yourself an Aneurysm. Besides nobody likes mean people!!
Really Frum Lib, I'm not angry and I'm not suggesting that we use 16th century standards to voice displeasure with opponents but the Iraq War is a very evil thing and it must be ended.
On second thought seeing some of the neo-cons, like Paul Wolfowitz, Jonah Goldberg, or Victor Davis Hanson, not to mention George W. Bush himself, take a public flogging for getting our country into this awful war would be a delightful thing indeed!
WRPN- Wanting someone to be flogged? Even if they're your worst enemy! You should always strive to be a better person than that!
With all due respects, it would be hilarious to see the enemies of the American people getting their comeuppance. Realistically, public floggings won't happen. Delaware, the last state to proscribe them, banned such useful punishments in 1948 and the best we can hope for is that the neo-con crowd, including their so called President, will, in the words of Leon Trotsky, find their place in the dustbin of history.
I don't think however that my support for state sponsored corporal punishment necessarily makes me a bad person.
Post a Comment